Comments on: Brooklyn Fare's Packaging and Graphic Design

By: M.S.

M.S. — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 06:29:53 +0000

@window
Check the video.. I think theres only one item thats a step for going green.
It would be bold to make all their items reusable.. I think recyclable should be enough for now.

By: window

window — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 20:10:40 +0000

I dont know, maybe im crazy, but i actualy read the article and it did mention that its focus is on clients that are "environmentally-friendly"....so while being disposable, it is still environmentally safe?? Either way I dont drink coffee......but its nice to see someone going against the corporate giant

By: Gigi

Gigi — Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:20:22 +0000

it's cool like the EAT company identity...
http://www.eat.co.uk/

By: Chris Ronk

Chris Ronk — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 03:01:13 +0000

I like the cups the best. No, really.

By: 2BFare

2BFare — Tue, 21 Jul 2009 17:12:40 +0000

Matt, it doesn't matter. It's a goddamn small, medium and large. Making up words to suck money out of pretenders' pockets is bull. Get your head out of your ass.

By: Alessandro

Alessandro — Sat, 18 Jul 2009 22:12:17 +0000

this is pure genius! Do like.

By: John V. Keogh

John V. Keogh — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 23:42:18 +0000

Only "sort of"?

By: Mark

Mark — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 23:37:13 +0000

Well, I don't bring my reusable mug, plate, fork, spoon, knife and napkin from home because I rarely walk out the door planning to just grab something to eat, it tends to be a spur of the momement decision.

The idea of everyone lugging a full place setting with them each time they leave home because they might pick-up something to eat is pure silliness

By: Ian Davies

Ian Davies — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 08:40:12 +0000

LMAO @ Ronbo13
Excellent! You said it all, so I didn't have to.

By: madvic

madvic — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 08:04:39 +0000

Je ne trouve pas ca soi original que ca. C'est du remaché....

By: Ronbo13

Ronbo13 — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 04:04:08 +0000

@ Harvard Irving:
You mean, other than the fact that 99 out of 100 people DON'T? You're criticizing a store for doing what's necessary, when the guys you're angry at are its customers. Grow up.
Are you seriously suggesting that these people try and open a store selling food without offering cups and sacks and napkins? What planet are you from. Please open such a store immediately, and then get right back to me about how well you did. I'll just sit here hitting the refresh button until you get back.

By: Harvard Irving

Harvard Irving — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:59:12 +0000

Great, more disposable crap. Just what we need.

Having stylish stuff printed on it it doesn't make it OK to consume this crap and contribute the the world's waste and resources problems. Why don't you just bring your own reusable mug from home?

By: John

John — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:11:05 +0000

Coyote, you can still order a short at Starbucks. (In fact, I occasionally do.)

By: coyote

coyote — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 23:52:24 +0000

Matt, so what happened to 'short'?

By: Matt

Matt — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 23:43:59 +0000

To be fair, Starbucks originally offered two sizes: short (8 oz.) and tall (12 oz.), and only later added the bigger (and thus aptly named) grande (16 oz.) and venti (20 oz.) sizes.

By: gagbro

gagbro — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 22:00:55 +0000

I wonder what their toilet paper looks like